top of page
logo

Edge-local evidence verification for distributed additive manufacturing.

Edge-local evidence verification for distributed additive manufacturing — offline, deterministic, and bounded by human authority.  KhaiClaw gives suppliers, shipyards, depots, and defense procurement a portable Build Dossier that proves itself wherever the part has to go.

Picture of KhaiClaw, LLC logo
This picture is KhaiClaw, LLC logo

THE CHALLENGE

Distributed AM scales only when evidence can move with the part.

Additive manufacturing can produce DoW-relevant and industrial sustainment components, but distributed production creates a different bottleneck: the evidence behind the part must remain complete, portable, tamper-evident, and reviewable across suppliers, depots, shipyards, primes, mobile cells, and government reviewers. When evidence is trapped in screenshots, local machines, disconnected logs, incompatible workflow systems, or manual spreadsheets, qualification and release review slow down. The printer may be ready, but the evidence package is not.

Evidence fragmentation

Process logs, material records, QA results, NCRs, release states, and custody records often live in separate systems.

Disconnected review

Depots, mobile AM cells, partner sites, and forward repair nodes may need to verify evidence without cloud access or live connection to the originating cell.

Authority boundary

Agentic systems must reduce reviewer burden without controlling machines, modifying evidence, closing NCRs, qualifying parts, or releasing production.

MFOS — Micro-Factory Operating System

MFOS is KhaiClaw’s production governance layer for distributed additive manufacturing.  It combines agentic workflows with a deterministic verification runtime to create cryptographically attributable Build Dossier packages that can be independently validated by government, prime, and depot reviewers — even in disconnected environments.

Edge-local & offline-capable verification

Fully operational in contested and disconnected expeditionary environments.

Tamper-evident cryptographic provenance

Immutable thread of truth from design intent to final physical component.

Strict agent authorization boundaries

Infrastructure-level enforcement of agentic workflow permissions.

Human-authorized release workflow

Ensuring critical production decisions remain under human expert governance.

Basis of Need — Trusted Scale for Defense Additive Manufacturing

The Department of War is rapidly scaling additive manufacturing for contested logistics, attritable systems and forward sustainment.  However, the governance and evidence infrastructure required to make distributed additive manufacturing trustworthy at defense scale has not kept pace.

Evidence fails at handoff.  When work moves between suppliers, shipyards, depots, or forward cells, configuration integrity and provenance are lost.  Rebuilding the record manually is too slow and unreliable for defense timelines and accountability requirements.

Agentic systems without boundaries create unacceptable risk.  As AI assists with design, planning, and inspection, there is no standardized, enforceable way to keep humans in the sole authorization chain for release, qualification, and high-consequence decisions.

bottom of page